Q: Do you think Wikipedia is reliable, unreliable or somewhere in between? I personally think it is reliable to an extent, but what do you think?
A: In Between. 1. There are some reliable sources which are most likely very famous in which many are dedicated to edit and refine the page. This articles are "locked" which means not everyone can revise it so that vandalism/ and wrong sources are prevented. 2. Some are reliable But we cannot be certain of this considering that everyone is allowed to have access on editing the page. (some people just assume to much and don't have facts and basis about what they are saying). 3. Some May just create some articles But are doing it just for fun and without any dedication. i.e Vandalism of some sort I say the description on number 1 are most the like the most informative and reliable while number 2 makes it 50%-50%; and number is the Bad side of it(i'm not sure if any are their but i've heard that one article was locked because of vandalism) Regardless Doing research is easier using wikipedia and I still use it as a source even after considering the down sides of it